Clear security review.
Close deals faster.

Cirelle's agent answers enterprise security reviews in hours, not weeks. It reads your code, cloud, and GRC stack, and links proof to every answer. It doesn't guess. It investigates.

free tokens for your first questionnaire · check every answer against source

vendor_security_review_2026.xlsx answering from source
Q147 · Agent oversight
"Can we terminate a running agent instance? Is there an API for it?"
github api/agent_runs.ts
aws ecs:StopTask scoped ✓
terraform agent_runtime.tf
grc stack ISO 42001 A.6 ✓
Answer · verified against 4 systems ✓
Where enterprise deals stall

Your customer said yes.
Procurement sent a spreadsheet.

212 questions about encryption, IAM, and everything about your AI. The answers live in five systems and your engineers' heads. The docs went stale 40 deploys ago.

vendor_security_review_2026.xlsx212 questions · 18 answered
#QuestionStatus
  • Q84Is MFA enforced for all employee accounts?Done
  • Q88Are RDS snapshots encrypted with a distinct KMS key?Open
  • Q91How is tenant data isolated at the query layer?Open
  • Q104Is TLS terminated before or after your WAF?Open
  • Q97Do you maintain a documented incident response plan?Done
  • Q118Which subprocessors receive customer data, and under what terms?Open
  • Q131How are secrets injected into CI? Any standing prod credentials?Open
  • Q147Describe key management: rotation, hierarchy, access to key material.Open
  • Q160What happens to customer embeddings when a tenant is deleted?Open
  • Q161Are prompt logs redacted before reaching observability vendors?Open
  • Q163Can your agents call external tools without an approval gate?Open
  • Q168Describe model rollback: who triggers it, how fast, tested when?Open
Encryption_Policy_v3_FINAL(2).pdf
last updated: 14 months ago
drift +412 changes
your actual stack
12+ engineering hoursper review, pulled from shipping
3 weeks of stallwhile the deal sits at procurement
The AI questions?Not in any doc. No owner.
Meet Cirelle

It answers like an engineer.
It investigates first.

Engineers don't search the wiki. They open the console and check. Cirelle does the same, at machine speed, across your whole surface:

Code

Reads your code.

Branch protections, secrets handling, every SDK call your AI makes. From GitHub, live.

Cloud

Reads your cloud.

Terraform, network topology, encryption config. AWS, GCP, Azure, as deployed right now.

Compliance

Reads your GRC.

Controls, evidence, audit state. Vanta, Drata, your policies. One source among many.

AI surface

Maps your AI.

Every model, prompt flow, agent permission, approval gate. Read from the implementation.

0 / 220 answered
6 flagged for human review

Any format: Excel, CAIQ, SIG, OneTrust, ServiceNow. Every answer with an evidence link. The handful that need judgment get flagged, not faked. You review. You approve. You ship.

The honest comparison

Same questionnaire.
Two very different machines.

Since 2025, reviews interrogate your models, agents, and guardrails. Those answers only exist in your code. Other tools read what you wrote about your company. Cirelle understands your product end-to-end, like an engineer.

Doc-retrieval toolsCirelle
Source of truthYour documentsYour systems
Answer freshnessLast policy reviewLast deploy
AI & agent questionsEscalate to engineeringRead from the implementation
ProofCites a PDF that claims itLinks the config that proves it
Answerable from docs
"Do you have an incident response plan?"
2025 →
Answered from your live stack
{ } "Which vector stores hold customer embeddings?"
{ } "Can your agents act without human approval?"
No doc has these. The answers live in how your product is built, deployed, and consumed.
"Which foundation models receive customer data, and do your subprocessor terms cover prompt logs?"
Doc-retrieval tool0.0s
Cirelle0.0s
recorded run · timings compressed
Built by the people who got tagged

We were the engineers Fortune 500 security teams kept tagging.

Years of enterprise reviews taught us what those teams actually check for. So we built the teammate we needed. Investigate first, answer second, always link the proof. And we hold it to an engineer's standard:

Read-only. Always. Scoped tokens, encrypted credentials, an audit log of every read.
Your code never trains models. Not ours, not anyone's.
Show, don't claim. Send us your security questionnaire. Cirelle answers it about itself, evidence included. That's the demo.
eng #security-review · your staff engineer
hey, quick question about the questionnaire 🙏
can you check how we handle key rotation?
do CI runners have prod creds? asking for Q131
what happens to embeddings when a tenant churns??
do we log LLM prompts anywhere?
procurement needs this by Friday 😬
cirelle answered 6 questions · evidence linked · thread resolved ✓
Days, not weeks.

Reviews clear in an afternoon.

Engineers keep shipping.

The Slack pings stop.

Answers that hold.

Fewer follow-up rounds, faster signatures.

AI is your best section.

The questions rivals dread, answered with precision.

"Why should we trust your answers?"
every answer → source

Your next enterprise deal already has a questionnaire attached.

Answer it from ground truth.

connect read-only in minutes · free tokens for your first questionnaire · check every answer yourself